![]() Since Adobe’s acquisition of Dreamweaver publisher Macromedia, however, both products are now owned by the same company, and it remains to be seen what impact that may have on the two product lines. While the competition has long centred on Dreamweaver and GoLive, however, I believe most would agree that GoLive has been struggling for quite awhile. So for the many mental health professionals who do want to have a hand in crafting their site’s look and feel - and certainly for those who manage their site’s structure and organisation directly, rather than through a CMS - packages like Dreamweaver and GoLive are worth evaluating.įor years, Dreamweaver and GoLive have been duking it out for the title of most capable visual editor although many different low-end packages are available for building web sites, none compares to these two heavyweights. Although many sites nowadays are created and maintained with a CMS (content management system), which enables webmasters to separate the job of handling content from the job of determining how pages will look, nonetheless visual editors still occupy an important or even essential role for anyone interested in modifying or creating that look in the first place. Readers of our previous review of Dreamweaver MX will know that the main reason packages like Dreamweaver originally came into existence was to provide a way for users to build and edit web pages in an environment where they could see how the page would actually look when displayed by a browser, as distinct from the code-centric environment of the underlying HTML or XHTML. ![]() ![]() The Role of Visual Editors, and the Current Leaders in the Field Current Users of Other Site Development Environments.Current Users of Earlier Versions of GoLive.Current Users of Earlier Versions of Dreamweaver. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |